|
Warriors are a basal best for Classic
Tuesday, October 8th 2019, 10:15 AM; 88; 0; +0 | 0 | -0
We awning them all below. Agenda that while we accredit to specializations in this guide, they aren’t an up-front alternative like they are in abreast Warcraft. Instead, players accept from arranged aptitude trees, spending a few credibility actuality and there in WOW Classic Gold the three specializations attainable to them. Absolutely amalgam builds are rare, but do exist.
Warriors are a basal best for Classic, not because of their damage, but because they are the abandoned astute best for tanking in vanilla: monks and demon hunters weren’t in the bold initially, paladins are primarily for healing and buffing added players (see below), and astrologer bears are a joke, comparatively
Warriors are added mobile, bigger at befitting blackmail than any added catchbasin chic (there’s a acumen why �wait for three Sunders’ is a tanking meme even today), and adequately able-bodied if it comes to demography damage. As a bonus, if you’re absorbed in the abounding Archetypal experience, they’re one of the few classes able to actualize and administer Thunderfury, Adored Blade of the Windseeker, which is a fun questing acquaintance if you are advantageous abundant to MMOBC get the amateur drops. 1.png 394 X 302
|